Skip to content

(wip) document asynchronous changes to snapctl#260

Open
Rnfudge02 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snapctl-async-doc
Open

(wip) document asynchronous changes to snapctl#260
Rnfudge02 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snapctl-async-doc

Conversation

@Rnfudge02
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Rnfudge02 Rnfudge02 commented Apr 10, 2026

This PR contains information on the release of the following PRs:

  • Async snapctl functionality
  • Is-ready sub-command and rate limiting/authentication.
  • --no-wait flag for asynchronous monitoring.
  • snapctl tasks/changes for retrieving all change information.
  • snap tasks for maintaining API between snapctl and snap commands.

From SNAPDENG-36723

@Rnfudge02 Rnfudge02 self-assigned this Apr 10, 2026
@Rnfudge02 Rnfudge02 marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2026 15:36
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@degville degville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great addition, thank you!


If these commands are run from a {ref}`hook <reference-development-supported-snap-hooks>`, the components will be installed/removed after the hook itself has run if it ended successfully.

## snapctl commands
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First bit almost repeats section above, omit for clarity

$ snapctl remove +<comp_name>

If these commands are run from a hook, the components will be installed/removed after the hook itself has run if it ended successfully.
### Asynchronous Operation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't see anywhere else that obviously describes snapctl operation so I feel this may be the most appropriate place in the docs for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants